Is 21-day lockdown enough to contain COVID-19? How is life under lockdown? Here is an early evidence of people's health conditions after one-month of lockdown in China.
Staying at home could be the best way to cut down the spread of COVID-19. However, here is a first study on the health conditions of adults after one month of COVID-19 lockdown. A new study provides some of the earliest pieces of evidence that the COVID-19 outbreak affected people mentally as well as physically.
‘Early evidence of people’s health conditions after one-month of lockdown in China can help other countries that just started confinement to understand its impact on mental health.’
Read More..
Key Findings:Read More..
- Restrictive measures to contain COVID-19 disrupt people’s normal work and life, which in turn may impact their health and wellbeing.
- Early evidence of people’s health conditions after one-month of lockdown in China can help other countries that just started confinement to understand its impact on mental health.
Researchers from the University of Adelaide, Tongji University and University of Sydney surveyed 369 adults living in 64 cities in China after they had lived under one-month of confinement measures in February this year.
Led by Dr Stephen Zhang from the University of Adelaide, the study identifies adults with existing health conditions and those who stopped working as most at risk of worse mental and physical health.
“As many parts of the world are only just beginning to go into lockdown, we examined the impact of the one-month long lockdown on people’s health, distress and life satisfaction,” said Dr Zhang.
“The study offers somewhat of a ‘crystal ball’ into the mental health of Australian residents once they have been in the lockdown for one month.”
Advertisement
Published in Psychiatry Research, the study suggests adults living in locations more affected by COVID-19 reported negative life satisfaction only among adults with chronic medical issues but not for those without existing health issues.
Advertisement
Study participants who exercised for more than 2.5 hours per day reported worse life satisfaction in more affected locations while those who exercised for half an hour or less during the lockdown reported positive life satisfaction.
“We were really surprised by the findings around exercising hours because it appears to be counter-intuitive,” said lead author Dr Zhang.
“It’s possible adults who exercised less could better justify or rationalize their inactive lifestyles in more severely affected cities. More research is needed but these early findings suggest we need to pay attention to more physically active individuals, who might be more frustrated by the restrictions.”
Source-Newswise