DNA That Ages: DNA of People With Depression or Childhood Abuse Age Faster

DNA samples of people who have had faced childhood abuse or depression at an early age could be older than the rest of the people of their age genetically, finds a new study.

DNA from people who suffer from major depression is biologically older than that of healthy people by on average eight months, suggesting that they are biologically older than their corresponding calendar age. These results are presented at the ECNP conference in Barcelona.

‘People who have had suffered from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) showed a degree of DNA methylation that reflects an increase in age and that too biologically.’

There is increasing evidence that serious depression and trauma is associated with shorter life-spans. Now an international team of researchers has shown that major depression causes measurable changes in the DNA of sufferers, giving values which correspond to those of older people.

Working with 811 depressed patients and 319 control subjects from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety, the team studied how their DNA extracted from blood samples was changed with age. The genetic material DNA is often processed in the body by methylation, which is when a methyl group (CH3) is added to the DNA. DNA methylation is a way the body allows gene function to be modified without changing the DNA sequence itself.

According to lead researcher, Laura Han (from the Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam), "What we see is, in fact, an �epigenetic clock,' where the patterns of modification of the body's DNA is an indicator of biological age. and this clock seems to run faster in those who are currently depressed or have been stressed".

On average the team found that patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) showed a degree of DNA methylation which corresponded to an increased age; biologically, they were on average eight months older than healthy control subjects. In some cases of extreme depression, patients were found to have a biological age of 10 to 15 years older than the chronological age. The team checked the finding by examining post-mortem brain samples, of 74 depressed patients and 64 control subjects, and found similar results in brain tissue.

Laura Han commented, "The fact that we saw similar results in both blood samples and post-mortem brain tissue helps support the belief that this is a real effect we are seeing."

Participants were also questioned about trauma, such as emotional neglect, sexual or physical abuse experienced before the age of 16. On average, those in the study who had undergone childhood trauma had a body clock 1.06 years older than the controls.

"This work shows that methylation levels at specific loci increase and decrease with age, and so this pattern of methylation is a good indicator of biological age. This difference becomes more apparent with increasing age, especially once people move into their 50s and 60s. We also found that where people had been subject to stressors such as childhood trauma, or Major Depressive Disorder, they showed a degree of DNA methylation which corresponded to that of older people".

"When we look within the group of depressed individuals, we see that childhood traumas experienced before the age of 16 were associated with even more pronounced epigenetic aging later in life. Of course, these are associations, so we need long-term linked studies (longitudinal studies) to be able to draw any conclusions whether the trauma causes the epigenetic aging".

This discovery that DNA methylation changes with age may have several practical consequences. For example, it may be useful as an early-warning sign of risk for certain age-related diseases, especially with those at the extremes who show significant shifts in their epigenetic clock. However, the major use of this technique may be less to do with individual health, but more to do with how it might help us see aging at a population (epidemiological) level.

Commenting, Professor Katharina Domschke, University of Freiburg, Germany (who was not involved in the work) said:

"This work is extremely important as it signifies the biological impact of trauma and depression on an epigenetic level and the necessity to employ preventive as well as early therapeutic interventions not only with regard to trauma-related depressive disorders per se but also with respect to age-related somatic as well as mental disorders."

Source: Medindia