Where Do Humans Stand When It Comes to AI in Healthcare?
Highlights:
- Recent surveys indicate that concerns about the potential negative impacts of AI in healthcare are on the rise, with a majority of respondents expressing more worry than excitement
- There is a significant increase in concerns about AI's impact on patient data privacy within the healthcare sector, highlighting the need for comprehensive data privacy regulations
- It's crucial for healthcare professionals and the public to engage in discussions, promote transparency, and advocate for measures to ensure responsible AI deployment in healthcare
Is Humanity Leading or Lagging in the Age of AI in Healthcare?
In recent times, discussions surrounding the emergence of generative artificial intelligence (AI) capable of producing convincing text and imagery have likely taken place among healthcare professionals, policymakers, and the public. These conversations have often revolved around the potential benefits and concerns associated with this technology. Recent findings indicate that apprehensions about the potential negative impacts of AI in healthcare are beginning to outweigh the enthusiasm for its positive applications.
‘The percentage of healthcare professionals and the public concerned about AI in healthcare rose from 37% in 2021 to 52%, signaling a significant shift in sentiment. #AI #healthcare’
A recent survey conducted by the Pew Research Center, involving over 11,000 individuals from the healthcare field and the general public, revealed that a majority of respondents express more worry about artificial intelligence in the context of healthcare than excitement. This shift in sentiment coincides with the growing attention devoted to AI's role in healthcare and medical practices. When compared to previous surveys, Pew notes a significant increase in the percentage of healthcare professionals and the public who are more concerned than excited about AI, rising from 37 percent in 2021 to 52 percent in the most recent survey (1✔).
The Level of Concern and Enthusiasm on Specific Healthcare AI Use Cases
When questioned about the adoption of AI by healthcare providers for patient care, approximately half of the respondents expressed uncertainty, while the remainder were evenly divided between those who believed it would be beneficial and those who perceived potential harm. More individuals held the belief that AI could enhance the quality of healthcare delivery by assisting healthcare professionals in diagnosis and treatment decisions. However, opinions may differ when considering specific applications of medical AI, such as the use of triaging algorithms to make critical decisions about patient treatment allocation.Notably, the survey identified a substantial increase in concerns about AI's impact on patient data privacy, particularly within the healthcare sector. This aligns with the calls from healthcare practitioners, policy experts, and researchers for comprehensive data privacy regulations to protect patient rights and ensure accountability for organizations utilizing AI in healthcare. As of now, legislative measures addressing privacy and data protection in healthcare AI remain under consideration.
One aspect not directly addressed in the survey is AI's potential to exacerbate or mitigate healthcare disparities and biases. Evidence spanning several years has shown that AI systems can either perpetuate or alleviate biases based on factors such as race, gender, or socioeconomic status in healthcare outcomes and treatment decisions. However, AI also has the potential to uncover hidden biases within healthcare systems and practices, offering opportunities for improvement.
These findings from Pew raise crucial questions about how individuals involved in healthcare, as well as those who are not directly engaged in AI development, can maintain a sense of autonomy as AI technology becomes increasingly prevalent and influential in the medical field. It underscores the notion that AI often feels like something happening to healthcare practitioners and patients, rather than a tool they actively shape or influence. This sentiment is particularly pronounced in regions outside of China, Europe, and the US. However, even those actively engaged in addressing ethical and human rights issues related to healthcare AI can sometimes feel powerless or discouraged.
Avenues for Healthcare Professionals and the Public to Exert More Control over AI's Impact on Healthcare
Scrutinize the intentions of individuals discussing the potential of AI in healthcare:
Especially in the context of superintelligent and artificial general intelligent systems. Fears about these advanced AI concepts can serve the interests of a small group of influential healthcare organizations and tech companies. Focusing on these hypothetical scenarios may overshadow the importance of addressing present-day healthcare AI challenges.
Promote broad conversations:
About AI's role in healthcare across the medical community and within society at large. Relying solely on healthcare industry executives and AI developers for guidance on ethical and practical considerations is akin to seeking advice from biased sources. Engaging in discussions at various levels of healthcare and involving diverse perspectives is crucial.
Recognize that historical predictions:
About the transformative impact of AI in healthcare may not always be accurate. While concerns about potential job displacement in the healthcare sector have arisen due to AI, widespread unemployment has not materialized. Additionally, regulatory measures have the potential to ensure responsible AI deployment while fostering innovation and job creation within the healthcare industry.
Embrace the understanding that comprehending AI's role in healthcare:
Is a fundamental aspect of healthcare professionals' and patients' roles in the 21st century. Educate oneself about the ethical and practical implications of AI in healthcare, and communicate expectations to elected officials and healthcare organizations. Advocate for measures such as transparent disclosure when AI influences healthcare decisions, the option for patients to opt out of automated decision-making, and regular audits or testing of AI systems used in healthcare settings to ensure fairness, accountability, and patient well-being.
In conclusion, the evolving landscape of AI in healthcare demands ongoing ethical scrutiny, collaboration, and advocacy for responsible deployment and patient well-being.
Reference:
- Growing public concern about the role of artificial intelligence in daily life - (https:www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/08/28/growing-public-concern-about-the-role-of-artificial-intelligence-in-daily-life/)
Source: Medindia
Cite this Article ⇣⇡
Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:
-
APA
Dr. Krishanga. (2023, September 02). Where Do Humans Stand When It Comes to AI in Healthcare?. Medindia. Retrieved on Dec 21, 2024 from https://www.medindia.net/news/healthinfocus/where-do-humans-stand-when-it-comes-to-ai-in-healthcare-213330-1.htm.
MLA
Dr. Krishanga. "Where Do Humans Stand When It Comes to AI in Healthcare?". Medindia. Dec 21, 2024. <https://www.medindia.net/news/healthinfocus/where-do-humans-stand-when-it-comes-to-ai-in-healthcare-213330-1.htm>.
Chicago
Dr. Krishanga. "Where Do Humans Stand When It Comes to AI in Healthcare?". Medindia. https://www.medindia.net/news/healthinfocus/where-do-humans-stand-when-it-comes-to-ai-in-healthcare-213330-1.htm. (accessed Dec 21, 2024).
Harvard
Dr. Krishanga. 2023. Where Do Humans Stand When It Comes to AI in Healthcare?. Medindia, viewed Dec 21, 2024, https://www.medindia.net/news/healthinfocus/where-do-humans-stand-when-it-comes-to-ai-in-healthcare-213330-1.htm.