How Fear Dominates in Climate Change Debates

Researchers argue that we have been forced to fear climate change but it really isn't as bad as it seems to be.

Historian Matthias Dorries has revealed the role of fear in our understanding of climate change.

He examined the cultural significance of fear and how it became a central presence in current debates over climate change.

Climatic change often prompts headlines predicting disastrous events, frequently adopting fear-laden language including analogies with war and warnings of the imminence or irreversibility of pending catastrophes.

Dorries from the University of Strasbourg said that a culture of fear is alive, and doing very well.

Dorries looked at the issue of fear from a historical perspective, asking how our current society has come to conceive of climate change in terms of catastrophe and fear.

"Recently historians have underlined the necessity to revise the grand Enlightenment narrative of science as antidote to fear.

"We should now look at how popular and scientific discourses frame fear, and study the constructive and destructive functions of these fear discourses in societies," said Dorries.

The 1960s and 1970s were characterized by an increasing appropriation of the future by science, leading to a rise of fear discourses by scientists themselves.

"For the very long run, science has indeed some terrifying prospects to offer for the planet Earth, and on a scale of decades, science has identified serious threats, such as anthropogenic climate change," he said.

"The current discourse of fear over climate change reflects the attempts to come to grips with the long-term issue of anthropogenic climate change.

"They are appeals for action, they imply claims to power, they stress that the issue is political and cultural, not merely a matter of science and reason alone," concluded Dorries.

The findings were published in WIREs Climate Change.

Source: ANI