Policyholders are dissatisfied with the insurers' claim-approval that the IRDA had to issue a circular asking them to refrain from rejecting genuine claims on the grounds that they are time-barred.

Explains Gai: "Sometimes, a person is admitted to hospital in an emergency (such as in the case of sudden appendicitis or heart attack) and his priority then is not to trace the policy document and intimate the insurance company. If a person forgets to inform the insurance company within the prescribed period (maximum seven days), then the claim is rejected even if it is submitted in time, within 30 days of discharge."
Then, there are cases where the claim-settlement process is stalled on the grounds that the original documents like discharge card, pathological test reports, X-rays, etc, were not submitted. "The original bills have to be submitted but not the documents, as these are required for subsequent follow-up treatment. There is no condition in a policy that requires the original reports to be handed over; just the copies would suffice. Yet, claims are rejected for non-submission of the original reports," he says.
In fact, so commonplace are cases of policyholders being dissatisfied with the insurers' claim-approval record that the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) has had to issue a circular to life as well as health insurance companies asking them to refrain from repudiating genuine claims on the grounds that they are time-barred.
Source-Medindia