It has long been known that proteins can be modified by adding sugars to them, and that this addition can change the way proteins function.
Researchers have discovered that the addition of sugar molecules to particular proteins plays a surprising variety of roles in basic developmental processes in plants. In the study published in The Plant Journal, a team of researchers led by CSHL Associate Professor Zachary Lippman investigated the role of certain evolutionarily conserved enzymes that add specific sugars to various proteins. Lippman and Cora MacAlister, lead author on the new paper, found that deleting the genes for these enzymes from the flowering mustard plant Arabidopsis thaliana and the moss Physcomitrella patens resulted in similar defects in both species, which are widely separated in evolutionary time. Surprisingly, however, these defects caused part of one species to grow more rapidly and part of the other to grow less rapidly than normal.
‘Researchers have previously shown that a group of sugar-adding enzymes, called Hydroxyproline O-arabinosyltransferases (HPATs), control stem cell production in tomato plants. Plants lacking the genes to make HPATs grow more flowers and larger fruit.’
Lippman said, "This demonstrates how important it is that proteins are decorated with these sugar molecules in different developmental contexts. It has long been known that proteins can be modified by adding sugars to them, and that this addition can change the way proteins function."
Lippman and his team have previously shown that a group of sugar-adding enzymes, called Hydroxyproline O-arabinosyltransferases (HPATs), control stem cell production in tomato plants. Plants lacking the genes to make HPATs grow more flowers and larger fruit, as if a natural brake on growth has been removed.
Lippman and MacAlister found that HPAT genes are also found across a wide variety of plant species, including in evolutionarily ancient plants such as mosses. Lippman said, "Plants at the base of the plant evolutionary lineage like moss don't have the same tissues and organs as flowering plants, which evolved more recently, so the genes' roles must be very different. We set out to explore those roles and did a comparative study between two plant species."
Unlike in tomato plants, deleting the HPAT genes in Arabidopsis and Physcomitrella did not seem to affect stem cell production. Lippman said, "The big surprise was the fact that in Arabidopsis, we only saw a defect in the growth of pollen tubes, which are required for fertilization and seed production." When the researchers looked in the moss, Physcomitrella, they saw defects in the growth of filaments that allow the moss to colonize neighboring soil.
Lippman said, "Both effects are part of a process known as tip growth. This led the team to propose that the ancient function of the HPAT genes is to control tip growth, which is likely related to key proteins that are critical for forming cell walls."
Advertisement
Lippman said, "These enzymes are like 'Jacks of all trades'. They do all sorts of targeting of different proteins in different developmental contexts. They are responsible for adding sugar molecules to numerous different types of proteins, whether it's a cell wall, or it's a small signaling peptide, which is what's responsible for the phenotypes in tomato."
Advertisement
Lippman said, "It's really remarkable how important these seemingly simple sugar modifications are for growth and development throughout the plant kingdom."
Source-Eurekalert