Blood Test is a Better Alternative For Invasive Biopsy For Lung Cancer

Advanced lung cancer could soon be diagnosed with a blood test to help to decide the best treatment for instead of having to get a tumor sample for analysis.

New data from the BFAST trial presented at the ESMO Congress 2019 have shown that the test can be used successfully to identify complex DNA mutations in the cells of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) suitable for the latest targeted medicines. (1,2) The technique detects tiny pieces of tumor DNA that are shed from cancer cells into the blood.

Lung Biopsy - Indications - Procedures - Risks - FAQs - Reference
The procedure by which tissue samples are obtained from the lung is known as lung biopsy. The biopsy tissues obtained from the lungs are examined by a pathologist.

‘At present, the technology is expensive, but as it becomes more widely prevalent, the cost is likely to come down so that testing becomes more affordable and available in daily practice.’
Read More..

"One of the biggest recent changes in the treatment of NSCLC has been our ability to identify targetable genetic mutations that drive the progression of the disease, but it is a major challenge to get a suitable tumor sample for analysis. We showed that liquid biopsy could be used to detect a complex type of driver mutation, called ALK, in patients with NSCLC. These then responded at least as well to targeted therapy as in previous studies using conventional biopsy techniques," explained study author Dr. Shirish Gadgeel, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, USA.

In the BFAST analysis, over 2,000 patients with untreated NSCLC had blood tests using state-of-the-art technology to check for multiple driver genetic mutations. (2) Approximately 1 in 20 were found to have tumor DNA showing a rearrangement in the ALK gene. In patients treated with alectinib, a cancer treatment that targets the ALK mutation, over three quarters showed no signs of disease progression in the subsequent 12 months.

"Liquid biopsy identified a similar proportion of patients with ALK mutations to that typically seen with traditional biopsy and the results with alectinib compared well with those seen in a pivotal study of this treatment," said Gadgeel.

Commenting on the results of the study, Prof Alberto Bardelli, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Italy, said:

"Rearrangement in the ALK gene described in the BFAST study is typically difficult to detect so it is an important advance to have shown that it can be detected in the blood and used to guide ALK inhibitor treatment which has then been demonstrated to be effective in patients with this mutation."

"It is encouraging to see that increasing numbers of patients with lung cancer can benefit from liquid biopsy to identify their disease mutation instead of tissue samples. At present, the technology is quite expensive, but as it becomes more widely used, the cost is likely to come down so that testing becomes more affordable and available in daily practice," he added.

Source-Eurekalert