The idea that bigger brains are better has received scientific backing, thanks to a new study of a tropical wasp, which suggests that the brainpower necessary to be dominant drives brain capacity.
The idea that bigger brains are better has received scientific backing, thanks to a new study of a tropical wasp, which suggests that the brainpower necessary to be dominant drives brain capacity.
Experiments by scientists at the University of Washington showed that key processing regions in the brains of both males and females of one wasp species not only increased in size with age but also were also associated with being dominant.The study also found different patterns of brain development in males and females.
Researchers showed that certain subregions were larger in males and others were larger in females. This matched expectations based on males’ greater use of vision and females’ greater reliance on their antennae.
UW researchers Sean O’Donnell and Yamile Molina found increased brain growth in areas of the insects’ brains called the mushroom bodies, which vaguely resemble the cerebrum in humans and other vertebrates.
O’Donnell, a UW associate professor of psychology, said that the social paper wasp that was studied, Mischocyttarus mastigorphorus, is unusual because males are dominant over females, a rarity among social insects, said.
O’Donnell and Molina, a UW doctoral student, focused on a part of the insects’ mushroom body, called the calyx, where neural connections are made. While the overall size of the calyces did not differ between the males and females, specific subregions were larger in each sex. Males rely on vision when they leave the nest for mating opportunities, and the part of the calyx that receives visual input was larger.
Advertisement
“When you are dominant among insects you get more food, and in this case it gives males more energy to leave the nest and mate. The fact that the males are dominant and long-lived makes this species interesting from a neurobiological standpoint. We think they have pretty sophisticated cognition compared to males of other wasp species,” O’Donnell said.
Advertisement
Each colony then was observed in the morning and afternoon every three days over the course of more than a month. Behavioral data such as giving and receiving aggression were collected, as well as time spent on and off the nest. After this observation period, sections of the wasps’ brains were examined under a microscope.
Among the unanswered questions stemming from this study include how long these wasps live and how long these patterns of brain growth continued.
“We only followed them for 42 days, so we don’t know how long they live. We also don’t know if their brain development is similar to humans in terms of if and when they start to decline cognitively,” he said.
He said an exciting new idea, the social challenge hypothesis, suggests that large human brains evolved in response to the demands of complex social interactions. The wasp work extends this idea to individual brain variation.
“Do you get to be dominant because of a big brain or does being dominant drive brain size? That’s still an open question and we don’t know which comes first,” said O’Donnell.
“This study suggests the high cognitive demands of being dominant drive brain capacity and supports the social brain hypothesis. The next step is to broaden the scope of the research by looking at more species of paper wasps. We are interested in how brains evolve in concert with social evolution. There is the intriguing possibility that there are similar patterns across wide spans of evolutionary time. My goal is to get a bigger sample of social wasp species and examine this,” he added.
The study is published in the online edition of the journal Developmental Neurobiology.
Source-ANI
SRM/L