Corticosteroid intake by risky pregnant women could prevent lung ailments among premature newborn and also reduces healthcare costs.
New study done by the researchers at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons proves that a drug given to few pregnant women to prevent severe respiratory ailments in preterm newborns reduces healthcare costs.// Drug previously shown effective in reducing breathing ailments in preemies
‘Corticosteroid therapy given for risky mothers is both highly effective for preventing lung disorders in babies and saves money.’
Read More..
Approximately 7 percent of babies in the U.S. are born in the late preterm period between 34 and 36 weeks of gestation and are more likely to experience severe respiratory problems than fullterm babies. Read More..
Based on the results of a clinical trial, published in 2016 in the New England Journal of Medicine, most women at risk for preterm delivery are now given a corticosteroid drug -- to speed a baby's lung development -- that reduces the risk of serious respiratory problems in late preterm babies.
"Doctors have widely adopted this preventive strategy for mothers at risk of giving birth prematurely," says Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman, MD, MSc, Ellen Jacobson Levine and Eugene Jacobson Professor of Obstetrics & Gynecology at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and an obstetrician and maternal-fetal medicine specialist at NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, who led the clinical trial. "But we didn't really know if it was cost-effective."
Drug saves money spent on breathing problems in newborns
In the new study, Gyamfi-Bannerman and colleagues tallied the healthcare costs of the 1,426 mother-infant pairs in the previous clinical trial who had received at least one injection of the drug, betamethasone, and 1,395 pairs from the same study who did not get the drug.
Advertisement
The analysis revealed that pairs who received betamethasone had average costs of $4,681 -- significantly lower than the $5,379 spent on the pairs who did not get the treatment. Previous studies to determine the cost-effectiveness of this strategy had mixed results, though they did not look at the same outcomes as those in the clinical trial.
Advertisement
Source-Eurekalert