The finding that women who received early chemotherapy for a recurrence of ovarian cancer did not live longer than those whose treatment is delayed needs to be reviewed, says an expert.
The finding that women who received early chemotherapy for a recurrence of ovarian cancer did not live longer than those whose treatment is delayed needs to be reviewed, says an expert. The study was published in The Lancet last month.
Now, Bradley Monk, gynaecologic oncologist at St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Centre in Phoenix, Arizona has warned that the results of the long-awaited global study of ovarian cancer should be viewed cautiously.
"While this study is a bold challenge to the assumption of early treatment, there are several significant problems with the findings," Monk said in an editorial in The Lancet.
"Our focus should no longer be on standard chemotherapy, but on targeted genetics-based treatments," he said.
He and Robert Morris of Wayne State University wrote that finding the relevant therapy is far more important than timing when treating ovarian cancer.
"The most troubling problem with the trial is that contemporary therapies were not available to most of the participants.
Advertisement
In the study, survival rates were not significantly different between those who started chemotherapy once a higher concentration of cancer-related proteins were detected and those whose treatment was delayed until they had clinical symptoms.
Advertisement
Of the 370 deaths, 186 occurred in the early treatment group and 184 in the delayed treatment. Median survival was 25.7 months for those on early treatment and 27.1 months for those on delayed treatment.
Source-ANI