A Cochrane Review has concluded that the aid of a robotic assistant while removing a patient's gallbladder through key-hole surgery is as safe as working with a human assistant.
When it comes to removing a patient's gallbladder with a key-hole surgery, a Cochrane Review has deemed the aid of a robotic assistant as safe as a human assistant.
The reviewers said that there was no difference between robot- and human-assisted surgeries in terms of morbidity, the need to switch to open surgery, total operating time, or length of stay in hospital.In key-hole surgery, the surgeon sees inside the patient using a long camera introduced through a 1 cm abdominal cut, which guides the doctor in using the surgical instruments introduced through other small cuts (ranging from 0.5 to 1 cm).
The assistant's job is to move the camera, which acts as the surgeon's eyes.
The assistant's job has come to be performed by a range of robots these days, and the current study looked at trials involving 'Endoassist', 'Aesop', 'Passist' and 'Zeus'.
With a view to determining how well robots were performing, a team of researchers considered data from five randomized trials that included a total of 453 patients.
The results showed a marginal, though not statistical, decrease in the numbers of gallbladders that burst during robot-assisted surgery, but overall there was no appreciable difference.
Advertisement
The assistance of robots attains significance as it means that a surgeon may perform an emergency operation without having to wait for a human assistant to become available.
Advertisement
Source-ANI
TAN/SK