In a recent study analyzing the cost effectiveness among hysterectomy, and endometrial ablation, releasing intrauterine system for treatment , hysterectomy emerged as the best suited option.
![Hysterectomy: A Cost Effective Option in Menorrhagea as Compared to Conservative Treatments Hysterectomy: A Cost Effective Option in Menorrhagea as Compared to Conservative Treatments](https://images.medindia.net/health-images/1200_1000/heavy-menstrual-bleeding.jpg)
Dr. Roberts reported the results as hysterectomy to be the preferred intervention for heavy menstrual bleeding. Study researchers agreed that hysterectomy is more expensive but it does produces more QALYs relative to other remaining strategies and hence is likely to be considered cost effective. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio for hysterectomy compared with Mirena is $2350 (£1440, €1633) per additional quality adjusted life year (QALY). Furthermore, the incremental cost effectiveness ratio for hysterectomy compared with second generation ablation is £970 per additional quality adjusted life year (QALY).
She concluded by stating, “In light of the acceptable thresholds used by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, hysterectomy would be considered the preferred strategy for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. The results concur with those of other studies but are highly sensitive to utility values used in the analysis.”
Reference Article
http://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.d2202.full
Source-Medindia