Millions of children would die from preventable diseases without vaccinations, but expanding its access can save $44 for every dollar spent.
Vaccination has emerged as an important strategy for preventing contagious diseases by saving the lives of 2 to 3 million people every year globally. Vaccinations, long recognized as an excellent investment that saves lives and prevents illness, could have significant economic value that far exceeds their original cost, revealed a new study from researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. In what is believed to be among the first studies to examine the potential return on investment of vaccinations, the researchers assessed the economic benefits of vaccines in 94 low- and middle-income countries using projected vaccination rates from 2011 to 2020.
‘Immunization coverage must expand and improve for encouraging donors and governments to continue their financial investments in vaccinations.’
When looking only at costs associated with illness, such as treatment costs and productivity losses, the return was $16 for every dollar spent on vaccines. In a separate analysis taking into account the broader economic impact of illness, vaccinations save $44 for every dollar spent. The study will appear in the February issue of Health Affairs.
"Vaccines are an excellent investment. But to reap the potential economic rewards, governments and donors must continue their investments in expanding access to vaccines," said lead author Sachiko Ozawa, an assistant scientist in the Department of International Health at the Bloomberg School.
Without vaccination, millions of children would die from preventable illnesses and diseases across the decade. While billions of dollars will be spent to try and vaccinate more children, the goal of full coverage -- that is, getting every child vaccinated -- has not yet been met.
To measure the potential investment returns, researchers used two approaches. The first, known as the "cost-of-illness" approach, measures averted treatment costs, transportation costs, lost caretaker wages and productivity losses. The second, known as the "full-income approach," estimates the broader economic and social benefits of vaccination and quantifies the value that people place on living longer and healthier lives. With both approaches, the costs of immunization programs were separately modeled to include supply chain, service delivery and vaccine costs.
Advertisement
The study assessed 10 vaccine-preventable infections: Hemophilus influenzae type b, hepatitis B, human papillomavirus, Japanese encephalitis, measles, Neisseria meningitis serogroup A, rotavirus, rubella, Streptococcus pneumoniae and yellow fever.
"Our findings should encourage donors and governments to continue their financial investments in immunization programs. But we must keep in mind that these are estimates that assume immunization coverage continues to expand and improve," Ozawa said.
Advertisement