A visual mechanism discovered by scientists determines how we perceive groups of objects and people in real and virtual or artificial worlds.
Vision scientists have long assumed that humans need to carefully consider multiple details before they can judge if a person or object is lifelike.A new research from the University of California, Berkeley has revealed that the human brain takes less than a second to tell between reality and fantasy.
‘Humans are visually wired to speedily take in information and make a snap judgment between reality and fantasy.’
The findings, published in the November issue of the journal Nature Communications, show that humans are visually wired to speedily take in information and make a snap judgment about what's real.UC Berkeley scientists have discovered a visual mechanism they call "ensemble lifelikeness perception," which determines how we perceive groups of objects and people in real and virtual or artificial worlds.
"This unique visual mechanism allows us to perceive what's really alive and what's simulated in just 250 milliseconds," said study lead author Allison Yamanashi Leib, a postdoctoral scholar in psychology at UC Berkeley. "It also guides us to determine the overall level of activity in a scene."
"But our study shows that participants made animacy decisions without conscious deliberation, and that they agreed on what was lifelike and what was not," said study senior author David Whitney, a UC Berkeley psychology professor. "It is surprising that, even without talking about it or deliberating about it together, we immediately share in our impressions of lifelikeness."
Using ensemble perception, study participants could also make snap judgments about the liveliness of groups of objects or people or entire scenes, without focusing on all the individual details, Whitney said.
Advertisement
Moreover, if we did not possess the ability to speedily determine lifelikeness, our world would be very confusing, with every person, animal or object we see appearing to be equally alive, Whitney said.
Advertisement
Participants quickly viewed groups of images, then rated them on a scale of one to 10 according to their average lifelikeness. Participants accurately assessed the average lifelikeness of the groups, even those displayed for less than 250 milliseconds.
In another experiment to test participants' memory for details, researchers flashed images, then showed them ones that participants had seen as well as ones they had not. The results indicated that while participants had forgotten a lot of details, their "ensemble perception" of what had been lifelike remained sharp.
"This suggests that the visual system favors abstract global impressions such as lifelikeness at the expense of the fine details," Whitney said. "We perceive the forest, and how alive it is, but not the trees."
Source-Eurekalert