Living Donor or Deceased Donor Transplant: Which has Better Outcomes?

Living donor transplants fare better than deceased donor transplants, as the transplant can be planned and can also reduce the risks.

Pediatric kidney transplant patients fare better and have better long-term outcomes when their kidney comes from living donors than deceased donors, reveals a new study.

A new UC Davis Health study finds that they do. The study reviewed data from the Organ Procurement & Transplantation Network database from Jan. 1, 2001 to Sept. 30, 2021.

Living Donor Liver Transplant: What Are the Risks? - Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment
The risk of dying as a result of a living donor liver segment removal is between 0.2-2.0%. The risk of morbidity is anywhere between 1.3% (in highly experienced centers) to 60%.

‘Living donor transplants fare better than deceased donor transplants, as the transplant can be planned and can also reduce the risks.’

Researchers compared the rates of graft failure (when the organ is rejected by the recipient) and death, as well as long-term outcomes of children who received kidney transplants from living related donors, living unrelated donors and deceased donors.

It is the largest study of its kind and was published in the journal Pediatric Transplantation.

“The findings of our study should lay to rest any fears and concerns that centers have about accepting organs from unrelated living donors,” said Lavjay Butani, senior author of the study and chief of pediatric nephrology at UC Davis Children’s Hospital.

World�s First Living Donor HIV-to-HIV Kidney Transplant
World’s first ever living donor HIV-to-HIV kidney transplant has been perfomed by a team from John Hopkins. Both the donor and recipient are doing well and the donor calls for more such donations.

“Living donation transplantation is superior to transplantation of organs from deceased donors in permitting better matching and management of the procured organ for the transplant surgery. Evidence from our large observational study shows that organs from living related donors are significantly better than deceased donor organs, whereas living unrelated donor transplants appear to be intermediate in risk between these two.”

The study looked at 12,089 children who received a kidney transplant during the 20-year study period. Three hundred twenty-seven (2.7%) children received kidneys from a living unrelated donor, 4,349 (36%) received a kidney from a living related donor (80% were parents, 6% were siblings, 13% were other relatives) and 7,413 (61%) were from deceased donors.

Are Living Donors Really Getting Their Due?
Living kidney donors are being denied the prompt access to organ transplant that they were promised while donating. These issues need to be discussed and addressed.

To be included in the study, recipients needed to have a graft that had not failed on the day of the surgical procedure. The majority of recipients were on dialysis before their kidney transplant.

Graft Loss is Linked to the Recipient’s Age

Recipient age was a predictor of graft loss. There was a higher risk of graft failure during the first post-transplant year in infants and pre-teens compared to teens. Interestingly, there was a lower risk of graft failure after the first post-transplant year in infants and pre-teens compared to teens.

Other predictors of graft loss found in the study are all previously well-established factors, including pre-transplant low albumin levels and the need for pre-transplant dialysis.

Source of Kidney Transplant Matters

Deceased donor transplants had the poorest graft survival after the first year (4% compared to 2.8% of living-related donors and 3.3% of living unrelated donors). Even when human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching between the donor and recipient is poor, those with living donor transplants fare better than transplants from deceased donors.

Laparoscopic Living Donor Surgery for Liver Transplant
Cleveland Clinic researchers have successfully performed the first purely laparoscopic living donor surgery for liver transplantation in an adult recipient.

“Living donor transplants fare better than deceased donor transplants since the transplant can be planned,” said Butani. “This planning allows for optimization of the donor and recipient’s health and minimizing ischemic stress on the graft once it’s procured from the donor.”

The study found that over the past several decades, the number of living unrelated donors has increased progressively from 1.3% in 1987 to 31.4% in 2017.

“Our analysis suggests that living unrelated donor organ transplants are not inferior to deceased donor organs,” said Daniel Tancredi, the study’s co-author and professor in the Pediatrics Department at UC Davis Health. “This is especially important for children who are the most vulnerable of all and have much to benefit from receiving the best possible available donor organ.”

Source-Eurekalert