New Anatomically Based Classification for Diagnosing Cervical Spinal Stenosis Developed By Researchers

A new, clinically meaningful scale of severity for diagnosing patients with cervical spinal stenosis was developed by physician-researchers at the Rothman Institute at Jefferson.

A new, clinically meaningful scale of severity for diagnosing patients with cervical spinal stenosis was developed by physician-researchers at the Rothman Institute at Jefferson. Their goal was to create a more accurate scale than the current "mild, moderate or severe" designations used for patients with this condition, a narrowing of the spinal canal in the neck. Researchers sought to create a reproducible, clinically validated classification of central cervical stenosis.

The group will present their results on Wednesday, March 20th, at 12:18 pm, McCormick Place, Room S102, at the annual American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) meeting in Chicago.

Steroid Injection may Lead to Worse Outcomes in Patients With Spinal Stenosis: Study
According to a study, for patients with spinal stenosis, epidural steroid injections (ESI) may actually lead to worse outcomes—whether or not the patient later undergoes surgery.

The current scale, researchers contend, does not carry any clinical or anatomical correlation. The presence or absence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) around the spinal cord is used as an important clinical decision making factor.

"We wanted to make a scale that defined more accurately the clinical decision making of the cervical spine," says Kristen E. Radcliff, M.D., assistant professor at Jefferson Medical College and lead researcher on the study.

Five fellowship-trained surgeons, three spine surgery fellows and three orthopedic residents reviewed a series of 46 cases and were asked to score each according to the following scale: Grade 0: no loss of CSF; Grade 1: Some loss of CSF; Grade 2: complete loss of CSF space; Grade 3: Loss of CSF space and deformation of the spinal cord greater than 25 percent; Grade 4: Loss of CSF space and signal change in spinal cord, the most severe case.

Risk of Complications in Spinal Stenosis Surgery is Lower If the Surgeon Conducts a Minimum of Four Surgeries Every Year
A new study published in the journal Neurosurgery reveals that the experience of a surgeon plays an important role in the outcome of the surgery.

"CSF space is an important marker for appropriate spinal cord perfusion and presence or absence of compression," says Dr. Radcliff.

Each rated the level of spondylolisthesis, slippage of the bone (vertebrae) onto the bone below; kyphosis, the over curvature or hunching of the upper back; and any symptoms of myelopathy, damage to the spinal cord.

Pulsed Radiofrequency, a Better Option for Treating Chronic Back Pain
A new study investigates the use of an alternative treatment known as pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) in treating chronic back pain.

Researchers found a statistically significant number of patients on whom spinal decompression was recommended in higher grades, with 83 percent in Grade 2, 95 percent in grade 3, and 100 percent (44/44) in grade 4.

The result is a new anatomically-based, clinically validated classification of cervical stenosis that aids the surgical decision-making process and allows for swift diagnosis and the most urgent surgical intervention for those with symptomatic Grade 2-4 stenosis. Patients with lower grade stenosis are first recommended and often better suited for nonsurgical treatment.

Spacer Insertion May Offer Less Invasive Option for Lumbar Problems
Implanting a small spacer between lumbar vertebrae during a procedure called interspinous process decompression may be an effective and minimally invasive way to treat spinal stenosis.

"It is our hope that this study allows for a more complete diagnosis, improves the accuracy of research and aids in improving communication regarding the severity of patients' conditions," adds Radcliff.

Source-Eurekalert