The US Supreme Court has ruled that drug makers can be sued if they make deals that delay creation of less expensive generic medications.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e29c0/e29c09e23f68b4887498c71eb1083722d517b974" alt="Pharma Companies can be Sued If They Make ‘Pay to Delay’ Deals Pharma Companies can be Sued If They Make ‘Pay to Delay’ Deals"
The decision, while finding the payments anti-competitive, did not go so far as to find the practice illegal.
"This court declines to hold that reverse payment settlement agreements are presumptively unlawful," the court said.
But the justices said litigants could challenge the individual deals in court on a case-by-case basis.
"Courts reviewing such agreements should proceed by applying the "rule of reason," rather than under a 'quick look' approach," the Supreme Court decision said.
The US government had argued before the court in March that pay-to-delay was tantamount to big drug manufacturers buying off competitors.
Advertisement
The court heard the case of drugmaker Solvay, a subsidiary of Abbott Laboratories, which paid $42 million per year to three generic drug manufacturers -- Par, Watson and Paddock -- in exchange for their postponing until 2015 generic versions of Solvay's hormonal treatment Androgel.
Advertisement
Drugmakers for their part argue that the arrangement allows them sufficient time to recoup expensive research and marketing costs that they incurred with their products.
Source-AFP