Potent disease-modifying drugs are more effective in reducing flare-ups in secondary progressive Multiple Sclerosis (MS) than the less potent drugs that tend to be safer to take.
Potent disease-modifying drugs are more effective in reducing flare-ups in secondary progressive Multiple Sclerosis (MS) compared to less potent drugs, as per the new study published in Neurology®. However, the researchers found no difference in how fast the disease progressed between these two types of drugs.
‘High-efficacy therapies are better compared to low-efficacy therapies in reducing relapses in people with active secondary progressive MS.’
Read More..
Most people with MS are initially diagnosed with relapsing-remitting MS, marked by symptom flare-ups called relapses followed by quiet periods called remission.
Read More..
More than half of these people eventually transition to secondary progressive MS, which is a slow, steady, worsening of the disease that may or may not include relapses.
"Multiple sclerosis is a complicated disease to treat and must be closely monitored as it is managed with various medications, some of which can have serious side effects," said study author Tomas Kalincik, MD, PhD, of the University of Melbourne in Australia.
"High-efficacy medications are prescribed in early multiple sclerosis to more aggressively treat the disease and have been found to more effectively prevent flare-ups and modify progression, but less is known about how effective these therapies may be later when relapsing-remitting MS transitions to secondary progressive MS."
The study involved 1,000 people with secondary progressive MS. Participants were followed for 10 years to see whether they had relapses and if they became more disabled over time.
Advertisement
People in each group were matched for factors like disability level and how long they had secondary progressive MS.
Advertisement
"Our study finding that high-efficacy therapies are superior to low-efficacy therapies only in reducing relapses in people with active secondary progressive MS provides valuable guidance for neurologists when choosing the most effective therapies for people with this form of MS," said Kalincik.
"When the goal is to alleviate ongoing relapse activity, more potent therapy is justified. But when the goal is to limit disability progression in secondary progressive MS, both types of drugs show comparable effectiveness."
A limitation of the study was that participants were grouped by those taking high-efficacy or low-efficacy therapies. However, therapies were not studied individually.
Kalincik said it is possible that individual therapies may have different effects on symptoms and disability and recommend that they be examined separately in future research.
Source-Eurekalert