Some new methods have advantages over traditional methods, but others are equivalent, according to a report in the June issue of Archives of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
![Tonsillectomy Techniques Evaluated by Analysis of Studies Tonsillectomy Techniques Evaluated by Analysis of Studies](https://images.medindia.net/health-images/1200_1000/Heart-Surgery-5.jpg)
Vangelis G. Alexiou, M.D., M.Sc., from Northampton General Hospital in England, and colleagues conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing tonsillectomy methods. The authors selected randomized, controlled trials of tonsillectomy techniques (VSS, HS or Coblation compared with CS/EC) from 1990 through July 14, 2010. In all, 33 trials including 3,139 patients were selected.
Analysis of the studies revealed that HS only outperformed CS/EC in terms of perioperative bleeding. Coblation did not appear to offer any benefits when compared with CS/EC. Patients who underwent tonsillectomies with VSS were significantly more likely than those undergoing CS/EC procedures to experience shorter surgeries, less bleeding, and less pain.
"In conclusion, despite its limitations, this meta-analysis provides evidence that the use of Coblation and HS for tonsillectomy is equivalent to the use of the conventional CS/ES technique," write the authors. "Surgeon experience, training, and preferences, as well as cost-effectiveness criteria, should be considered." They note that VSS appeared to offer benefits to CS/ES, and call for further research to supplement the limited data with regards to this technique.
Source-Eurekalert